Bad Religion- Generator
Written on June 7, 2013

Bad Religion Generator- 1992
RMR Album Rating- 7 (Excellent)
![]()
Fans and critics cite Generator as the album where Bad Religion started to change, and there is some validity to that, but the change is slight, and Generator still has plenty of Bad Religion’s speedy, melodic, and intelligent trademarks to make it a winner.
Taken as a whole, Generator has a different feel than Bad Religion’s previous three records, but each song taken independently could have fit in on any of Bad Religion’s previous three albums. So, the seeds of change might have been planted on Generator, but they were gradually sown and harvested over the next several albums.
Bad Religion’s songs and lyrics have always been provocative, challenging, and pointed, but up until Generator, there wasn’t any central theme uniting the songs on the albums (with the exception of the ever present themes of religion and politics that are on every Bad Religion album). Generator can be considered a semi-concept album that explores the economy, over-population, and political conflict, and there is background information and quotes in the liner notes before the lyrics of each song.
The highlights of the record are “Generator,” “Tomorrow,” “Heaven is falling,” and “Atomic Garden.” There’s also their best slower number to date with “The Answer.” The weakest tracks are “Chimaera” and “Only Entertainment,” the two closing songs. They are definitely filler, and I find it odd that they are tracked together back to back at the end of the album.
There’s also the infamous “Two Babies in the Dark,” which has to be the oddest song in the Bad Religion catalog. I used to hate the song, but it has grown on me over the years, and I can now admit that it has become a guilty pleasure for me.
All in all, there’s a lot to process with Generator. There’s the start of a new sound and the incorporation of a central concept, but the record is still excellent, and it contains some of Bad Religion’s best songs.
Rate this album now! Scroll over the stars and click to rate.













Gurewitz’s song “You” is a slight nod to The Beatles song “We Can Work It Out.” Although the songs have different meanings, both songs share some lyrical themes; Gurewitz even quotes “We Can Work It Out” with the line “There’s no time for fussing or fighting my friend,” which creates a direct correlation between the songs. Plus, there are other similar verses. Here are two verses to compare:
—Bad Religion:
“And eternity, my friend, is a long fucking time/ Because there’s no time for fussing and fighting my friend”
—The Beatles:
“Life is very short/ and there’s no time for fussing and fighting, my friend
—Bad Religion:
“There’s a place where everyone can be right/ Even though you remain determined to be opposed”
—The Beatles:
“Try to see it my way/ Do I have to keep on talking till I can’t go on/ While you see it your way”
To me, this is the definitive BR Record. Greg and Brett’s song writing is in balance to the point that, while their two styles are discernible, they are not in competition.
Lyrical high points
1. The life advice provided in henchman. “What good advice have I got for you, to ensure against your likely metamorphosis into this reprobate? Don’t be a henchman. Stand on your laurels. Do what no one else does and praise the good of other men for good men’s sake.”
2. The patronizing description of Christian’s view of the afterlife in You. While religious myself, I find his use of children’s imagery to condescendingly mock a lyrical masterstroke.
Lyrical Lowpoint
3. Mr Brett’s non mea culpa in Billy. When he asks, “Where is the justice when no one is at fault and a human life is tragically wasted?” in regards to the fictional Billy’s heroin use, I find it a somewhat pathetic attempt to claim that Brett’s own addiction was just something that happened rather the result of bad choices.
I would be remiss if I did not correct a portion of my last post. I should have written that Greg was mocking Christians’ view of the afterlife (plural and possessive) rather than Christian’s (as in the view held by a certain individual named Christian). “Where is the justice when no one is at fault and an English sentence is tragically punctuated?”